Apple’s iPad: Can it Work for Digital Nomads and Teleworkers?

by James Schipper · 17 comments

iPad - www.livecollarfree.com

Is the iPad the perfect device for today’s Remote Workers? While no device or tool is perfect for every job or person, the iPad may very well be just the thing for me.

Using today’s technology, Location Independent Professionals work from anywhere. Cell phones, near ubiquitous coverage of wi-fi networks in the city, and relatively inexpensive 3G connections when off the main grid have all shifted the concept of work in recent years. Go to any coffee shop and you are bound to see at least one person banging keys on a laptop, and that guy in the faded jeans thumb-typing on his iPhone may very well be closing a sale or placing an order.

I am rarely the first person to go out and buy the latest and greatest new thing. I am a bit of a minimalist that has never owned an iPod or a flat screen tv. My smartphone has the “Smart” turned off, so it is only rarely used for phone calls and text messaging.  I no longer use a desktop computer. My laptop is more than enough for my needs. I could work exclusively from a computer in the public library if I really needed to, and not have to own a single gadget.

The laptop is still too big to want to carry around wherever I go (a 5 year old Toshiba). I had tossed around my tech “ideal” of a Kindle, an iPod Touch, and a netbook at some point. The iPad would do just fine for all 3 of those for my needs in a single item.

When producing, I do a lot of writing and other content creation. Not heavy graphics-intensive CAD stuff that would need more processing power. Word processing, blogging, internet, email, spreadsheets — all basic things that any netbook could easily do.

I consume a lot of information on the web. When surfing the web or answering most email, I don’t normally write a lot. I didn’t expect to do a lot of work stuff from anywhere but the laptop. But a lot of what I do for research or in my free time is still online. The iTouch is a fantastic portable solution for most of this that is also great for music and podcasts, of course.

I read as many as 3 books a week, but refuse to stockpile a massive library. When I finish a book, it goes off to live where someone else can benefit from it. I only read magazines or newspapers online now. A book reader is something I definitely want. I read most books through the Kindle App on the laptop already.

The iTouch would be for sitting around in a coffee shop, campsite, or a park but not really working. The netbook for short trips where I didn’t want to bring the laptop (and may eventually replace the laptop). The Kindle would be for reading all the books I then would not have to carry around.

But Apple announced the iPad, I compared it to this previous ideal to see how it stacked up against these other gadgets for the needs of a Digital Nomad.

iPod Touch

The iTouch is a good little web, email, music, book reader, and game tool. I actually got one as a gift earlier this year, and it has already received a lot of use. I read 5 or 6 books on it the first few weeks I had it. The tiny screen makes page-turning more frequent and is a bit harder to read than a big screen.

It’s only a backup for the times I didn’t have a netbook or laptop with me to get on the web, as browsing on a tiny screen is less than ideal. The wireless-only usually works just fine, since there are wi-fi networks almost everywhere now. I wouldn’t be able to send emails if I was away from civilization, but that’s about it.

The only real advantage the iTouch has over the iPad is the portability. It can be carried in a pocket, but the iPad does everything that can be done on the iTouch. Heavy advantage goes to the iPad here.

Kindle

E-Ink is the screen tech on Amazon’s Kindle. It’s basically a non-backlit screen, which is easier on the eyes, especially for reading full-length books. Backlit screens like the iPad are lights, so it is hard on the eyes to stare at them all day. And you can read them easily outside in the sunlight or anywhere except in the dark.

Kindle’s e-ink screen is not color. The iPad has a gorgeous full-color screen.

The iPad can be read in a dark room. I’ve read books in bed late at night on my iTouch. If I wanted to do that with the Kindle, I would have to turn on the light. The iPad may be hard to read outside in sunlight. This advantage depends on which was a bigger trade-off: reading in the dark or at the beach.

Kindle is a great book reader, and they now added the ability to use Twitter and Facebook. You can download books in seconds, and be reading from anywhere. But that’s all it does.

If you want a very good book reader, the Kindle is tough to beat. If you want a very good book reader that can do several hundred thousand other things, the iPad wins by miles. Kindle replaces books. iPad replaces books and several other gadgets.

Netbook

The netbook for me would be mostly for content generation, but again, it was a kind of overlapping redundancy to the other gadgets. It’s inconvenient to type more than a paragraph or two on an iTouch. The netbook is good enough to type on with a tiny screen, but it’s like another laptop to lug around when I want to read a book in bed.

Netbooks can do more than the iPad. They use a full Operating System that run almost every application I can run on my full-sized laptop. The iPad still requires a computer to synch with. You have to have a computer to use an iPad (at least initially. Anyone want to correct me on this part?).

LiveCollarFree.com on iPadThe onscreen keyboard on the iPad was much easier to use than I had anticipated. You have to look at your fingers to type on the iPad. The keys are on the screen, so there is no feel to it. No home keys to find with touch only. Ergonomically, this can’t be a good thing for a lot of content creation. You have to look down the whole time you type, so this would not be a better solution, even with a cute homemade pillow like our friends the Technomads just got for their iPads.

The on-screen keyboard is good enough for answering emails, tweets, and other brief items from the to-do list. So no major advantage to the netbook for that. The bluetooth keyboard and some sort of case or stand to prop the iPad up like a monitor solves the ergonomic and touch-typing issues, but now you are back to lugging around as much as a netbook. The only advantage is the option to leave the keyboard behind.

The battery life being reported from iPad owners is better than any netbook on the market. Another concern when trying to travel light is carrying as few additional power supplies as needed.

iPad Beats Them All

The iPad may not be the very best solution in every area, but it covers so many tasks so well, it is hard to beat.

The form factor of the iPad is something that gives it an advantage over traditional netbooks. It’s simple. Like reading a notepad. It’s just a one-piece touchscreen. No clam shell and extra stuff hanging from it.

Developers are only just beginning to tap into the possibilities of this new device. With so many amazing things being done with iPhone apps, I am excited to see the many uses that people can come up with for the iPad.

Of course if you are heavy into gaming with high-end graphics, have no need for a book reader, and don’t need anything other than what you already have, there will be no point to buying an iPad. But it will be a huge seller. People panned the iPod when it came out. I thought the iTouch was silly when I first saw it (“it’s an iPhone with no phone??”) Then I got to play with one and realized how well it works and how useful it could be. Apple has sold millions of iPod Touches — they are going to sell a ton of iPads.

While the Kindle may be a better ebook reader, the iTouch is a smaller, more convenient web and game toy, and the Netbook is a more powerful content creator, the iPad looks to do all of those things well enough for me all in one beautiful overall package.

Are you planning on buying an iPad, or have one already? Tell us what you think in the comments below.

{ 17 comments… read them below or add one }

1 Freakshow999 May 3, 2010 at 4:59 pm

Damn it….

I just wrote a very long counter review here and then hit the back button on my mouse…

Long story short. I strongly disagree. Net book is still way more bang for the buck that covers all things you are looking at using it for more efficiently.

Reply

2 James Schipper May 3, 2010 at 5:23 pm

I knew you would disagree. I find I do less and less on the computer, too. As far as needing heavy processing power. I used to have a bunch of software I “had to have”, but there really isn’t much nowadays I can’t do without.

I know I couldn’t do without a netbook or laptop, but the iPad is just because I want it. I want to read in bed, whether I’m laying on my back, side, or belly. But there are at least 11 different tablet-style machines in development right now. Most of those are running some version of Windows 7, and are essentially touchscreen netbooks without a keyboard.

Reply

3 Andrew May 3, 2010 at 9:37 pm

Steve Jobs has effectively cast a spell on much of the population. The iPad is a device for “consumers” in a very strict sense of the word. Its entire design is built around the use case of one-way message delivery from the nebulous outside elsewhere (Apple being the preferred source of course) to the user. The only output potential a user has is the objectively inferior on-screen keyboard, and even this is limited in its efficacy/usability.

What makes computing, the internet, and the world great is interaction. Shifting the paradigm back to the one-way-heavy messaging of the print and TV era may be commercially advantageous for Apple and individually attractive to their customers, but that view is a myopic and fundamental loss for humanity. You effectively end up with a device built for ‘sharing’ and ‘liking’ the information you’ve been sent. Marinate in the implications of that for a while. :)

Fortunately for Apple, vapid consumers of one-way information also tend to be vapid consumers of just… one… more… gadget (ad infinitum).

Reply

4 James Schipper May 3, 2010 at 9:46 pm

Funny you say that Andrew. All the interactions we’ve had tonight have been through my iTouch. ;-)

Reply

5 Andrew May 3, 2010 at 10:09 pm

Exactly. The Touch form factor has the same “possible, but limited” interactive capability of the significantly larger iPad + a camera + much higher portability. The tiny form factor solves the “what to take that will do a lot of stuff, but is tiny” problem. The iPad doesn’t solve that, or any other problem that I can see. Well, aside for the “what to buy if I want to buy something the size of a netbook that will allow me to primarily be a receiver of messages and says Apple on it” problem. I don’t have that problem. I don’t think you do either.

How many words are in the original post? You certainlycould write something like that on an iPad (or Touch if you really really wanted to), but I don’t think anyone would choose to given the option of using an Apple ™ MacBook Pro, iMac, Mac Pro, et cetera.

Reply

6 James Schipper May 4, 2010 at 1:46 pm

What difference would the Apple logo make? You aren’t confusing me with a Fanboi, are you? :-) I don’t agree with your assessment of the problem an iPad would solve.

Like most gadgets or tech, it is simply a matter of convenience and choice. There are very few people who will suddenly be able to survive due to the existence of such a thing and technological advancement can now cease, for we have found the final answer. But I’ve often thought, “I would really like something that would do *blank* for me.” And the iPad covers a lot of those blanks. If I don’t have one, I’ll still get everything done.

Cavemen got along just fine with netbooks instead of iPads. They don’t need one. It just makes some things easier. I didn’t say it was ideal for every scenario or person.

Reply

7 Andrew May 4, 2010 at 8:28 pm

What!? You don’t agree with my sarcastic intentional mischaracterization? This is an outrage! :)

You used a pretty hard-line, Maslovian definition of “need” in reframing my criticism. All I meant was, “the iPad doesn’t do anything new”. The idea isn’t new. It’s just a netbook without a physical keyboard, usb, multitasking, et cetera or an iPod Touch with a bigger screen and no camera, gps, et cetera. With that in mind, I can’t think of any reason for the incredible, awesome, terrific, magnificent, unbelievable, far better, breakthrough, remarkable, wonderful, phenomenal, tremendous, great, amazing, beautiful hype aside from the logo.

It’s Marketing 101… You can either create a product that fills an existing market need/niche, or you can create a market in the minds of your target customer. Apple did the latter. That’s fine, but the need/niche still only exists in the minds of the target customers even after their consumption is fully realized by their very own fingerprints smudging up their very own iPad screen.

8 soultravelers3 May 4, 2010 at 11:46 am

Interesting reading. We’re huge mac fans ( been traveling the world with them since 2006) but trying to decide if we want to add something more or not. For us, it’s primarily for a library for our child who is a truly voracious reader at a Harry Potter level.

Love the bells & whistles of the iPad, but am not convinced yet that it is the one, actually leaning towards Nook at the moment. We won’t buy until October before we head to Asia ( and while in US) but I love reading the many opinions.

You might like to look at what we wrote and what people commented on when we recently brought up this subject:
http://www.soultravelers3.com/2010/04/aroundtheworld-family-travel-digital-nomads-lifestyle-design-4-hour-workweek-international-vacations.html#more

What makes it hard is VERY few have used ANY of these things in the way that we would like …living everywhere…so hard to really get accurate info for our conditions.
soultravelers3´s last blog ..Travel Book Review: Every Day in Tuscany by Mayes My ComLuv Profile

Reply

9 James Schipper May 4, 2010 at 2:10 pm

With all the apps that have come out since the iPhone first arrived, there are going to be a huge amount of educational apps for this one, even at Mozart’s higher learning level. But if all you want is a book reader, then the extra cost for the bells & whistles is a factor too.

It does less than your MacBooks, and until they make them international you may be out of luck with the iPad, anyway. If you do get a chance to try them out abroad at some point, let me know how well it works. That isn’t something that mattered to me at this point, but might in the future.

Reply

10 Wilson Usman May 8, 2010 at 8:50 am

I don’t know but I believe its hard to beat the ipad. Why? people that have apple just absolutely will nothing other than something with the apple logo on it. I myself can’t afford any of their products except my iphone 3gs and I will probably won’t buy any other phone either.

In this case I will say I’ve played with most of these that you describe and really the experience of the ipad was excellent. Nothing like it out there!
Wilson Usman´s last blog ..5 Manifestos you Must Read as a New Entrepreneur My ComLuv Profile

Reply

11 James Schipper May 11, 2010 at 10:23 am

I agree there are the fans who will want it no matter what. Much of the huge following is because of the clean designs and that they most often simply “just work” perfectly. Though I sold Apple products back in the late 80′s (think $6000 Laserwriters and Mac IIci), I haven’t ever owned any until now. This is a limited OS on the iPod Touch/iPhone/iPad, but it works very well.

Reply

12 Katie@ iPad news June 2, 2010 at 10:20 am

I think the iPad, iPod and iPhone are excellent products, they are made well and the OS and apps work well too, what i dont like about Apple is the cost of the devices, for what they are. i think they are very expensive and you can only upgrade their computers etc with parts from them, but nobody can argue the company is streets ahead when it comes to innovation!.

Katie

Reply

13 James Schipper June 8, 2010 at 10:55 am

True, and they are really targeted at people who just need something that works. I have 1 app on my iPod Touch that crashes, but everything else always just works. I hear the tech guys complaining about how limited they are unless you jailbreak them and all that. But for the majority of people out there, they just want something that works with minimal fuss.

If you like tinkering and taking things apart and customizing every detail, Apple’s products may not be the best for that. But they sure do make nice products. I’m becoming a fan.

Reply

14 Jonny @ thelifething.com June 10, 2010 at 2:40 am

Hello James,

Confused by the comment on my site but like the look of yours. I have subscribed and will follow your new few posts with interest.

Also, 3 books a week is impressive by anyone’s standards. I hit about 75 a year so I understand the time commitment to over 150. Kudos.

Reply

15 Billy - complete havoc June 19, 2010 at 11:05 pm

I writing this from my iPad, until using the iPhone I couldn’t stand apple… But then again I’ve done Linux and Novell work for too many years.

The iPad gives me portability I didn’t have with the HP or samsung netbooks. The browsing experience is much better on the iPad, the screen rocks, and the tablet makes it easy to read in bed or while waiting in line. Press power and its on, no waiting for booting and when I need to do small windows required tasks logmein works great… Gotomeeting allows for meetings to take place anywhere you have 3 bars. Then have your magazines PDF by a VA and have them loaded to SugerSync… In a very short amount of time I have become dependent on my iPad… I’ve even start to ween myself away from my paper notebook, thought that is a slow process.

Reply

16 James Schipper July 12, 2010 at 12:55 pm

After being able to spend more time with one, I am beginning to find them more useful, too. I still don’t think I could spend an inordinate amount of time typing on one, but I am still happy otherwise with the tablet itself.

Reply

17 Tim July 19, 2010 at 12:19 am

My iPad has become the device that gets used more than any other in my arsenal. I own several desktops, several laptops, and multiple hand helds. The iPad does virtually everything I need short of power computing.

Reply

Leave a Comment

CommentLuv Enabled

Previous post:

Next post: